Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Woolfson v. Doyle, Trustee in Reorganization, et al., 1959 — 360 U.S. 903 · caselaw · US
Securities
Woolfson v. Doyle, Trustee in Reorganization, et al.
360 U.S. 903·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 877.
Woolfson v. Doyle, Trustee in Reorganization, et al.
Petitioner pro se. Edward D. Bums, John A. Kiser and Daniel J. Driscoll for Doyle, and Solicitor General Rankin, Thomas’ G. Meeker and David Ferber for the Securities and Exchange Commission, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.