Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William A. Brady, Appellant and Respondent, v. Patrick T. Powers et al., Respondents and Appellants, Impleaded with Another, 1907 — 188 N.Y. 626 · caselaw · US
General
William A. Brady, Appellant and Respondent, v. Patrick T. Powers et al., Respondents and Appellants, Impleaded with Another
188 N.Y. 626·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William A. Brady, Appellant and Respondent, v. Patrick T. Powers et al., Respondents and Appellants, Impleaded with Another.
(Argued April 30, 1907;
decided May 21, 1907.)
Brady v. Powers, 113 App. Div. 845, modified.
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 28, 1906, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an ■ action for a dissolution of a partnership and for an accounting.
David Gerber for plaintiff, appellant and respondent.
James A. Allen and Roger Foster for defendants, respondents and appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment of the Appellate Division modified so as to provide that the plaintiff, "William A. Brady, recover of the defendant Patrick T. Powers the sum of §3,798.01, with interest thereon from the 13th day of December, 1904; that the plaintiff also recover a separate and independent judgment against the defendant Kate Kennedy, as administratrix of the goods, chattels and credits of -James 0. Kennedy, deceased, for the like sum of §3,798.01, with interest thereon from the 13tli day of December, 1904; that the plaintiff recover of the said defendants jointly and severally the sum of §2,452.43, being the costs and disbursements allowed by the judgment of the Special Term, with interest thereon from the 13th day of December, 1904, and that said judgment as so modified be affirmed, without costs in this court to either party. No opfinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, "Vann, Werner and Willard Bartlett, JJ. For affirmance without modification : Cray and Chase, JJ.