Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles Jones, Appellant, v. The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Respondent, 1902 — 171 N.Y. 628 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Charles Jones, Appellant, v. The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Respondent
171 N.Y. 628·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles Jones, Appellant, v. The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Respondent.
Jones v. Mayor, etc., of New Torlr,, 60 App. Div. 622, affirmed.
(Argued March 31, 1902;
decided April 15, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 15, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.
L. Laflin Kellogg and Alfred C. Petté for appellant.
George L. Rives, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly and Chase Mellen of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, JJ.