Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
SUN INDEMNITY CO. OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff in Error, v. SOUTHERN SURETY COMPANY OF DES MOINES, IOWA, 1927 — 21 F.2d 1020 · caselaw · US
General
SUN INDEMNITY CO. OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff in Error, v. SOUTHERN SURETY COMPANY OF DES MOINES, IOWA
21 F.2d 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SUN INDEMNITY CO. OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff in Error, v. SOUTHERN SURETY COMPANY OF DES MOINES, IOWA.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
April 14, 1927.
No. 7695.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Iowa.
Frank J. Comfort, Harley H. Stipp, Eugene D. Perry, Robert J. Bannister, Vincent Starzinger, and F. A. Little, all of Des Moines, Iowa, for plaintiff in error.
J. L. Parrish and James C. Davis, both of Des Moines, Iowa, for defendant in. error.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Writ of error dismissed, with costs, on motion of plaintiff in error and consent of defendant in error.