Torts · MBE-tested
Frederick Gilmore, Respondent, v. Syracuse Lighting Company, Appellant
191 N.Y. 534·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frederick Gilmore, Respondent, v. Syracuse Lighting Company, Appellant.
Gilmore v. Syracuse Lighting Co., 116 App. Div. 921, affirmed.
(Argued February 25, 1908;
decided March 10, 1908.)
Appeal from- a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 1, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been received through defendant’s negligence
Edward Schoeneck for appellant.
Theodore E. Hancock for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no Opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Yann, Werner, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.