Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James J. McComb, Respondent, v. The Cordova Apartment Association and Alfred P. Boller, Impleaded, etc., Appellants, 1889 — 115 N.Y. 654 · caselaw · US
Administrative
James J. McComb, Respondent, v. The Cordova Apartment Association and Alfred P. Boller, Impleaded, etc., Appellants
115 N.Y. 654·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James J. McComb, Respondent, v. The Cordova Apartment Association and Alfred P. Boller, Impleaded, etc., Appellants.
(Argued June 19, 1889;
decided June 28, 1889.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made March 29, 1889, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for the payment of certain moneys collected by the receiver herein.
George K. Adams for appellants.
Edwin O. Perkins for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Gray, J., not sitting.
Order affirmed.