Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of The Troy Press Company, Respondent, for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus against The Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Rensselaer County. The Troy Observer Publishing Company, Appellant., 1904 — 179 N.Y. 529 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of The Troy Press Company, Respondent, for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus against The Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Rensselaer County. The Troy Observer Publishing Company, Appellant.
179 N.Y. 529·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of The Troy Press Company, Respondent, for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus against The Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Rensselaer County. The Troy Observer Publishing Company, Appellant.
Matter of Troy Press Go., 94 App. Div. 514, affirmed.
(Argued June 2, 1904;
decided June 17, 1904.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 14, 1904, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the clerk of the hoard of supervisors of Rensselaer county to notify the secretary of state of the designation of the Troy Daily Dress as an' official newspaper, and granted such motion.
T. J. Quillincm for appellant.
G. B. Wellington for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Pabkeb, Ch. J., O’Bbien, Baetlett, Mabtin, Vann, Cullen and Weeneb, JJ.