Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS EX REL. GERSCH, v. CITY OF CHICAGO ET AL., 1913 — 226 U.S. 451 · caselaw · US
General
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS EX REL. GERSCH, v. CITY OF CHICAGO ET AL.
226 U.S. 45157 L. Ed. 295·Supreme Court of the United States·1913
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS EX REL. GERSCH, v. CITY OF CHICAGO ET AL.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS.
No. 474.
Submitted December 16, 1912.
Decided January 6, 1913.
Where the record does not contain the final judgment to which the writ of error'is directed this court cannot assume that a judgment was entered and is without authority to exert jurisdiction.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Mr. John W. Beckwith and Mr. W: H. Sexton, for the defendants in error, in support of motion to dismiss or affirm.
Mr. Allen B. Chilcoat and Mr. Stephen A. Day, for the plaintiff in error, in opposition thereto.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Chief Justice White:]
Memorandum opinion, by direction of the court, by
Mr. Chief Justice White:
This is a companion case to Preston v. City of Chicago, No. 195, just disposed of. Unlike the record in the Preston case, however, the record in this case does not contain the final judgment to which the writ of error is directed. As we cannot assume that a judgment was- in fact entered in the Supreme Court of Illinois, it results that we are without authority to exert jurisdiction.
Writ of error dismissed.