General

Charles M. Warner, Respondent, v. Louis House, Appellant, Impleaded with Others

178 N.Y. 604·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Charles M. Warner, Respondent, v. Louis House, Appellant, Impleaded with Others. Wan'ner v. Rouse, 90 App. Dir. 611, appeal dismissed. (Argued April 25, 1904; decided April 28, 1904,) Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, made January 5, 1904, which affirmed.an order of a Trial Term setting aside a verdict in favor of defendant and granting a new trial. The motion was made upon the ground that the order appealed from was not appealable to the Court of Appeals. ■ Alexander H. Oowie for motion. Gostello, Welch db Gostello opposed. [MAJORITY] Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.