Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Burton G. MCDONALD, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, 1932 — 58 F.2d 1083 · caselaw · US
General
Burton G. MCDONALD, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
58 F.2d 1083·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Burton G. MCDONALD, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 6681.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 31, 1932.
See opinion of March 21, 1932, McDonald v. Harding, Judge, 57 F.(2d) 119, on petition for mandamus.
George B. Grigsby of Ketchikan, Alaska (Robert W. Jennings, of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for appellant.
Howard D. Stabler, U. S. Atty., of Juneau, Alaska.
Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and ST, SURE, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Ordered that a judgment of affirmance be filed and entered in this court, and that the mandate of this court issue 30 days from date.