Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the General Assignment of John F. Talmage and Daniel Talmage, Individually and as Copartners, Composing the Firm of Dan. Talmage's Sons, for the Benefit of Creditors, to Joseph Gillet. Joseph Gillet et al., Appellants; Laura A. Talmage et al., Respondents, 1900 — 161 N.Y. 643 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the General Assignment of John F. Talmage and Daniel Talmage, Individually and as Copartners, Composing the Firm of Dan. Talmage's Sons, for the Benefit of Creditors, to Joseph Gillet. Joseph Gillet et al., Appellants; Laura A. Talmage et al., Respondents
161 N.Y. 643·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the General Assignment of John F. Talmage and Daniel Talmage, Individually and as Copartners, Composing the Firm of Dan. Talmage’s Sons, for the Benefit of Creditors, to Joseph Gillet. Joseph Gillet et al., Appellants; Laura A. Talmage et al., Respondents.
Matter of Talmage, 39 App. Div. 466, affirmed.
(Argued January 8, 1900;
decided January 23, 1900.)
Appeal from an order and judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered, respectively, April 28 and May 15,1899, which modified an order of the Special Term confirming the report of a referee, passing the accounts of Joseph Gillet, as assignee.
Charles E. Rushmore, Theron C. Strong and Roger S. Baldwin for appellants.
Hector M. Hitchings and Melvin G. Palliser for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Pabkeb, Ch. J., Gbay, O’Beien, Babtlett, Haight, Mabtin and Vann, JJ.