Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
H. F. MIRES, Acting Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Petitioner, v. ALABAMA BY-PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Birmingham Coke & By-Products Co., Majestic Coal Co., and Imperial Coal & Coke Co., Respondents, 1933 — 62 F.2d 1076 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
H. F. MIRES, Acting Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Petitioner, v. ALABAMA BY-PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Birmingham Coke & By-Products Co., Majestic Coal Co., and Imperial Coal & Coke Co., Respondents
62 F.2d 1076·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1933
Before BRYAN, FOSTER, and SIBLEY, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
H. F. MIRES, Acting Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Petitioner, v. ALABAMA BY-PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Birmingham Coke & By-Products Co., Majestic Coal Co., and Imperial Coal & Coke Co., Respondents.
No. 6073.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 18, 1933.
G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., Se-wall Key, Sp! Asst, to Atty. Gen., and C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue,- and Percy S.r Crewe, Sp'. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of 'Washington, D. C., for petitioner., '
Osear W. Underwood, Jr., and H. C. Kilpatrick, both of Washington, D. C., for respondents.
Before BRYAN, FOSTER, and SIBLEY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard upon the joint stipulation of counsel that the decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals in the above entitled and numbered cause be reversed, and that said Board of Tax Appeals enter its order that the unpaid portion of the correct income tax for the period March 1, 1920, to December 31, 1920, of the respondents is $27,213.51, together , with interest properly applicable thereto as provided by law, and was submitted to the court.
On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that the decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals in the above entitled and numbered cause be, and the same is hereby, reversed, and that said cause be remanded to the said United States Board of Tax Appeals with instructions to enter an order that the unpaid portion of the correct income tax for the period March 1, 1920, to December 31, 1920’, of the respondents is $27,213.51, together with interest properly applicable thereto as provided by law. It is further ordered and adjudged that the mandate of this court issue without delay.