General
United New York and New Jersey Sandy Hook Pilots Association et al. v. Halecki, Administratrix
358 U.S. 803·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
with whom Mr. Justice Harlan joins, would grant the Government’s motion for leave to participate in the oral argument of this case in view of the important public interest with which the Government is charged in carrying out the congressional policy for a government-owned merchant marine and in view of the confused state of the law dealing with the issues raised by this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 56.
United New York and New Jersey Sandy Hook Pilots Association et al. v. Halecki, Adminis-tratrix.
Solicitor General Rankin for the United States, movant. Nathan Baker for respondent in opposition to the motion.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice Frankfurter,]
Certiorari, 357 U. S. 903, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument is denied.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter,
with whom Mr. Justice Harlan joins, would grant the Government’s motion for leave to participate in the oral argument of this case in view of the important public interest with which the Government is charged in carrying out the congressional policy for a government-owned merchant marine and in view of the confused state of the law dealing with the issues raised by this case.