Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
C. B. Boyett et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The United States, 1907 — 207 U.S. 581 · caselaw · US
General
C. B. Boyett et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The United States
207 U.S. 581·Supreme Court of the United States·1907
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 35.
C. B. Boyett et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The United States.
In error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Submitted November 5, 1907.
Decided November 11, 1907.
Mr. J. W. Blackwood for plaintiffs in error. The Attorney General for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded with a direction to sustain the motion in arrest of judgment, on- the authority of Hodges v. United States, 203 U. S. 1.