Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles A. Hess, as Assignee of Sol Sayles, Respondent, v. W. & J. Sloane, Appellant, 1903 — 173 N.Y. 616 · caselaw · US
General
Charles A. Hess, as Assignee of Sol Sayles, Respondent, v. W. & J. Sloane, Appellant
173 N.Y. 616·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles A. Hess, as Assignee of Sol Sayles, Respondent, v. W. & J. Sloane, Appellant.
Hess v. Sloane, 66 App. Div. 522, affirmed.
(Argued January 13, 1903;
decided January 30, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered Decernher 11, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Selden Bacon for appellant.
Louis Marshall and M. G. Holstein for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann and Werner, JJ.