Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Charles T. Carnahan, Plaintiff in Error, v. P. K. Connolly
187 U.S. 63623 S. Ct. 844·Supreme Court of the United States·1902
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nos. 328, 329 and 330.
Charles T. Carnahan, Plaintiff in Error, v. P. K. Connolly.
In error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Colorado.
Motion to dismiss submitted October 20, 1902.
Decided October 27, 1902.
Mr. Charles J. Hughes, Jr., for the plaintiff in error. Mr. C. S. Thomas, Mr. W. H. Bryant and Mr. H. H. Lee for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Writs of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction on the authority of Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Harrison v. Morton, 171 U. S. 38; Erie Railroad Company v. Purdy, 185 U. S. 148, and other cases; and see Carnahan v. Connolly, 68 Pac. Rep. 836.