Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
J. E. Arnott et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Southern Railway Company, 1914 — 232 U.S. 717 · caselaw · US
General
J. E. Arnott et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Southern Railway Company
232 U.S. 717·Supreme Court of the United States·1914
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 196.
J. E. Arnott et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Southern Railway Company.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Tennessee.
Argued January 26, 1914.
Decided February 2, 1914.
Mr. C. J. St. John for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. L. E. Jeffries for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY]
Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Hammond v. Johnston, 142 U. S. 73; New Orleans v. N. O. Water Works Co., 142 U. S. 79; Arkansas Southern R. R. v. German Bank, 207 U. S. 270; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 112; Rogers v. Jones, 214 U. S. 196.