General
McCormick et al. v. Texas; Earvin v. Texas; Steelman v. Colorado et al.; Stinson v. Louisiana State Bar Assn.; Black v. Payne et al.; Pollard v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.; Hargrave v. Florida; Peeler v. Arizona; Hawk v. Oregon; Sibley v. United States
444 U.S. 985·Supreme Court of the United States·1979
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 78-6680.
No. 78-6777.
No. 78-6805.
No. 79-34.
No. 79-76.
No. 79-295.
No. 79-5031.
No. 79-5263.
No. 79-5285.
No. 79-5385.
McCormick et al. v. Texas, Earvin v. Texas, Steelman v. Colorado et al., Stinson v. Louisiana State Bar Assn., Black v. Payne et al., Pollard v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., Hargrave v. Florida, Peeler v. Arizona, Hawk v. Oregon, Sibley v. United States,
[MAJORITY]
ante, p. 919;
ante, p. 919;
ante, p. 915;
ante, p. 803;
ante, p. 867;
ante, p. 917;
ante, p. 919;
ante, p. 919 ;
ante, p. 921; and
ante, p. 937. Petitions for rehearing denied.