General
Cora C. WILKENING, Plaintiff in Error, v. Gladys Mary MOORE, Defendant in Error
2 F.2d 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1924
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Cora C. WILKENING, Plaintiff in Error, v. Gladys Mary MOORE, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
November 3, 1924.)
No. 44.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Diamond, Abrahams & Strauss, of New York City (Joseph L. Greenberg, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.
O’Brien, Malevinsky & Driscoll, of New York City (Dennis F. O’Brien, M. L. Malevinsky, and Joseph Walker Magrauth, all of New York City, of counsel), for defendant in error.
Before ROGERS and MANTON, Circuit Judges, and LEARNED HAND, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed.