Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Thomas Hill, Jr., Respondent, v. Abram L. Warner, Appellant, 1898 — 155 N.Y. 626 · caselaw · US
General
Thomas Hill, Jr., Respondent, v. Abram L. Warner, Appellant
155 N.Y. 626·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas Hill, Jr., Respondent, v. Abram L. Warner, Appellant.
Reported below, 12 App. Div. 624.
(Argued January 10, 1898;
decided January 18, 1898.)
Motion for leave to withdraw an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 28, 1896, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict.
The motion was made in order that an application might be made to the Appellate Division to amend or resettle the case and exceptions herein.
Shire & Jellineh for motion.
Simon Fleisohmann opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted on payment of the costs that have accrued.