Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lawrence O. KELLOGG et al., Appellants, v. SPEEDAUMAT MANUFACTURING COMPANY, a Corporation of Delaware, 1933 — 64 F.2d 1015 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Lawrence O. KELLOGG et al., Appellants, v. SPEEDAUMAT MANUFACTURING COMPANY, a Corporation of Delaware
64 F.2d 1015·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lawrence O. KELLOGG et al., Appellants, v. SPEEDAUMAT MANUFACTURING COMPANY, a Corporation of Delaware.
No. 9611.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
March 14, 1933.
Charles C. Reif and G. H. Braddoek, both of Minneapolis, Minn., for appellant.
William 0. Belt, of Chicago, 111., A. C. Paul and Maurice Moore, both of Minneapolis, Minn., for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURTAIL]
PER CURTAIL
Appeal from interlocutory order dismissed, without costs to either party in this court, on motion of appellee and consent of appellant.