Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. H. Thorn, 1913 — 227 U.S. 675 · caselaw · US
General
The Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. H. Thorn
227 U.S. 675·Supreme Court of the United States·1913
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 134.
The Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. H. Thorn.
In error to the County Court of Sabine County, State of Texas.
Mr. J. W. Terry, Mr. Gardiner Lathróp, Mr. A. H. Oulwell, Mr. A. B. Browne, Mr. Alexander Britton and Mr. Evans Browne for the plaintiff in error.
No appearance for the defendant in error.
January 27, 1913.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment reversed with costs, and" cause remanded for further proceedings, upon the authority of Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Dennis, 224 U. S. 503.