Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George B. McLellan, Appellant, v. Nat C. Goodwin, Respondent, 1902 — 169 N.Y. 600 · caselaw · US
General
George B. McLellan, Appellant, v. Nat C. Goodwin, Respondent
169 N.Y. 600·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George B. McLellan, Appellant, v. Nat C. Goodwin, Respondent.
MoLellan v. Goodwin, 53 App. Div. 630, appeal dismissed.
(Argued January 6, 1903;
decided January 14, 1902.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appel-" ' late Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial depart-merit, entered June 13, 1900, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term.
The motion was made upon the grounds that no undertaking has been served as required by section 1326 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and that the Appellate Division having unanimously decided that there was evidence tending to support the facts found by the trial court, no appeal lies therefrom to the Court of Appeals.
Archibald Foote Gla/rTc for motion.
Franklin Bien opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted, with ten dollars costs, unless plaintiff files undertaking within ten days, in which case motion denied.