Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Conrad Cramer, as Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. John Chester et al., Respondents, 1883 — 91 N.Y. 664 · caselaw · US
General
Conrad Cramer, as Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. John Chester et al., Respondents
91 N.Y. 664·New York Court of Appeals·1883·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Conrad Cramer, as Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. John Chester et al., Respondents.
(Submitted February 5, 1883;
decided March 6, 1883.)
Decided on the facts.
W. A. Beach for appellant.
Sidney 8. Harris for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Danforth, J.,]
Danforth, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.