Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Muth, Administratrix v. Atlass et al., Executors; and Darr, Administratrix v. Atlass et al., Executors, 1966 ā 382 U.S. 988 Ā· caselaw Ā· US
General
Muth, Administratrix v. Atlass et al., Executors; and Darr, Administratrix v. Atlass et al., Executors
382 U.S. 988Ā·Supreme Court of the United StatesĀ·1966
Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted, the Court of Appealsā judgment reversed, and the District Courtās judgment affirmed.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 709. No. 733.
Muth, Administratrix v. Atlass et al., Executors; and Darr, Administratrix v. Atlass et al., Executors.
Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted, the Court of Appealsā judgment reversed, and the District Courtās judgment affirmed.
G. Kent Yowell for petitioner in No. 709.
Harold A. Liebenson and Edward G. Raszus for petitioner in No. 733.
Edward B. Hayes for respondents in both cases.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 350 F. 2d 592.