Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Landman, Superintendent of the Five Civilized Tribes, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1942 — 315 U.S. 810 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Landman, Superintendent of the Five Civilized Tribes, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
315 U.S. 810·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 904.
Landman, Superintendent of the Five Civilized Tribes, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
March 2, 1942.
Messrs. Huston Thompson and Oscar P. Mast for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Clark, and Messrs. J. Louis Monarch and Bernard Chertcoff for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied. Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.