General
Frank Harms, as Administrator of the Estate of Joseph Harms, Deceased, Appellant, v. Henry P. Burgard, Respondent
174 N.Y. 503·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frank Harms, as Administrator of the Estate of Joseph Harms, Deceased, Appellant, v. Henry P. Burgard, Respondent.
Harms v. B-urgard, 66 App. Div. 622, affirmed.
(Argued February 11, 1903;
decided March 3, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered Hovember 26, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Garitón E. Ladd and Eugene W. Ilarrmgton for appellant.
’ Edward E. Goatsworth for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker. Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Martin, Vann and Werner, JJ. Not voting: Haight, J.