Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Thomas I. Storm et al., as Trustees of School District No. 5 of the Town of East Fishkill, Respondents, v. The New York and New England Railroad Company, Appellant, 1899 — 159 N.Y. 538 · caselaw · US
General
Thomas I. Storm et al., as Trustees of School District No. 5 of the Town of East Fishkill, Respondents, v. The New York and New England Railroad Company, Appellant
159 N.Y. 538·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas I. Storm et al., as Trustees of School District No. 5 of the Town of East Fishkill, Respondents, v. The New York and New England Railroad Company, Appellant.
Storm v. F. Y. & N. E. R. R. Co., 83 Hun, 86, affirmed.
(Submitted April 21, 1899;
decided May 12, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 15, 1895, upon an order modifying and, as modified, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Walter C. Anthony, for appellant.
Ilackett & Williams for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, and ten per cent damages under subdivision 5, section 3251, Code of Civil Procedure ; no opinion.
All concur.