Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. D. Roy Mumford, 1906 — 203 U.S. 601 · caselaw · US
General
The Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. D. Roy Mumford
203 U.S. 601·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 205.
The Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. D. Roy Mumford.
December 3, 1906.
Mr. Robert Mather for plaintiff in error. Mr. N. D. Ely, Mr. Arthur G. Bush and Mr. Charles F. Wilson for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY]
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Iowa.
Dismissed with costs, on authority of counsel for the plaintiff in error.