General
John E. Roller, Plaintiff in Error, v. Lindsay M. Armentrout
245 U.S. 642·Supreme Court of the United States·1918
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 167.
John E. Roller, Plaintiff in Error, v. Lindsay M. Armentrout.
In error to the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of Virginia.
Submitted January 25, 1918.
Decided January 28, 1918.
Mr. John E. Roller pro se.
Mr. Everett Dulaney Ott for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Quriam.]
Per Quriam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. 652, 658; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14; (2) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Holden Land Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536, 541; Mellon Co. v. McCafferty, 239 U. S. 134.