Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Seth B. Robinson, Appellant, v. Herman Passavant et al., Respondents, 1895 — 147 N.Y. 714 · caselaw · US
General
Seth B. Robinson, Appellant, v. Herman Passavant et al., Respondents
147 N.Y. 714·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Seth B. Robinson, Appellant, v. Herman Passavant et al., Respondents.
Reported below, 73 Hun, 138.
(Argued October 16, 1895;
decided November 1, 1895.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 5, 1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant dismissing plaintiff’s complaint upon the merits entered upon the report of a referee.
Charles De Hart Brower for appellant.
Cha/rles H. Hughes for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of General Term,
All concur.