Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Alaska Pacific Steamship Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Industrial Accident Commission of the State of California et al., 1918 — 246 U.S. 648 · caselaw · US
General
Alaska Pacific Steamship Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Industrial Accident Commission of the State of California et al.
246 U.S. 648·Supreme Court of the United States·1918
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nos. 474 and 475.
Alaska Pacific Steamship Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Industrial Accident Commission of the State of California et al.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of California.
March 4, 1918.
Mr. Ira A. Campbell and Mr. Edward J. McCutchen for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Christopher M. Bradley for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Stipulations of counsel to the effect that the same judgments may be entered in' these cases as in case No. 476, (next supra) having been filed, the judgments are therefore reversed and the eases remanded for further proceedings.