Contracts · MBE-tested
John A. Husson, Respondent, v. William G. Oppenheim, Appellant
101 N.Y. 673·New York Court of Appeals·1886·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John A. Husson, Respondent, v. William G. Oppenheim, Appellant.
(Argued February 9, 1886;
decided March 2, 1886.)
This action was upon a contract. The questions presented here were simply as to the construction of the contract and the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings of the trial court.
Marh Cohn for appellant.
Moore <& Moore for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Gwriam]
Per Gwriam
opinion for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.