Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Addison D. O'Neill, as Executor, etc. David O'Neill et al., Individually and as Guardians, Appellants, v. Thomas M. Tyng, Special Guardian, Respondent, 1896 — 148 N.Y. 742 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Addison D. O'Neill, as Executor, etc. David O'Neill et al., Individually and as Guardians, Appellants, v. Thomas M. Tyng, Special Guardian, Respondent
148 N.Y. 742·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Addison D. O'Neill, as Executor, etc. David O'Neill et al., Individually and as Guardians, Appellants, v. Thomas M. Tyng, Special Guardian, Respondent.
Mem. of decision below, 89 Hun, 612.
(Argued January 20, 1896;
decided January 31, 1896.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made October 18, 1895, which affirmed an order of the Surrogate’s Court of the county of New York denying an application for the removal of a special guardian.
George TV. Glasé for appellants.
Thomas M. Tyng, respondent, in person.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs ; no opinion.
All concur.