Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William Oppenheim, Respondent, v. John McGovern, Appellant, 1907 — 189 N.Y. 572 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
William Oppenheim, Respondent, v. John McGovern, Appellant
189 N.Y. 572·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William Oppenheim, Respondent, v. John McGovern, Appellant.
Oppenheim v. McGovern, 115 App. Div. 135, affirmed.
(Submitted October 16, 1907;
decided November 1, 1907.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered October 24, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintifi entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to recover money paid on a contract for the purchase of certain real- property.
John P. Everett for appellant.
Morton Stein for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscook, JJ.