Contracts · MBE-tested
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad Co. et al.; Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen et al. v. Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad Co. et al.; Order of Railway Conductors & Brakemen v. Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad Co. et al.; Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad Co. et al. v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen et al.; and Bangor & Aroostook Railroad Co. et al. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen
390 U.S. 923·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 859.
No. 861.
No. 862.
No. 863.
No. 933.
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad Co. et al.; Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen et al. v. Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad Co. et al.; Order of Railway Conductors & Brakemen v. Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad Co. et al.; Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad Co. et al. v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen et al.; and Bangor & Aroostook Railroad Co. et al. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen.
Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., John Silard, Harriett R. Taylor, Isaac N. Groner, Harold C. Heiss, Donald W. Bennett, Alex Elson, Willard J. Lassers and Aaron S. Wolff for petitioner, and Francis M. Shea, Richard T. Conway and James R. Wolfe for respondents in No. 859.
Milton Kramer, Lester P. Schoene and Martin W. Fingerhut for petitioners, and Messrs. Shea, Conway and Wolfe for respondents in No. 861.
James D. Hill and Harry E. Wilmarth for petitioner, and Messrs. Shea, Conway and Wolfe for respondents in No. 862.
Messrs. Shea, Conway and Wolfe for petitioners, and Messrs. Kramer, Schoene and Fingerhut for Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen et al., and Messrs. Hill and Wil-marth for Order of Railway Conductors & Brakemen, respondents, in No. 863.
Messrs. Shea, Conway and Wolfe for petitioners, and Messrs. Rauh, Silard, Groner, Heiss, Bennett, Elson, Lassers and Wolff, David Epstein, and Mrs. Taylor for respondent in No. 933.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
Reported below: 128 U. S. App. D. C. 59, 385 F. 2d 581.