Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Singleton, Chief, Bureau of Medical Services, Department of Health and Welfare of Missouri v. Wulff et al., 1975 — 422 U.S. 1041 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Singleton, Chief, Bureau of Medical Services, Department of Health and Welfare of Missouri v. Wulff et al.
422 U.S. 1041·Supreme Court of the United States·1975
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Reported below: 508 F. 2d 1211.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 74-1393.
Singleton, Chief, Bureau of Medical Services, Department of Health and Welfare of Missouri v. Wulff et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition which read as follows:
“1. Whether there is a logical nexus between the status of respondent-physicians and the claims they seek to have adjudicated sufficient to confer standing on them to challenge the constitutionality of Section 208.152, RSMo Supp. 1973.
“2. Whether the Court of Appeals acted in excess of its jurisdiction when it proceeded to determine on the merits the constitutionality of Section 208.152, RSMo Supp. 1973.”
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Reported below: 508 F. 2d 1211.