Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Communications Workers of America v. Western Electric Co., Inc., et al.; and Colorado Department of Labor and Employment et al. v. Western Electric Co., Inc., et al., 1977 — 429 U.S. 1067 · caselaw · US
General
Communications Workers of America v. Western Electric Co., Inc., et al.; and Colorado Department of Labor and Employment et al. v. Western Electric Co., Inc., et al.
429 U.S. 1067·Supreme Court of the United States·1977
Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Stewart would note probable jurisdiction and set cases for oral argument.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 76-459.
No. 76-478.
Communications Workers of America v. Western Electric Co., Inc., et al.; and Colorado Department of Labor and Employment et al. v. Western Electric Co., Inc., et al.
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from Sup. Ct. Colo, dismissed for want of substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Stewart would note probable jurisdiction and set cases for oral argument.