Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Hattie Adkinson, Respondent, v. The State of New York, Appellant
187 N.Y. 566·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hattie Adkinson, Respondent, v. The State of New York, Appellant.
Adkinson v. State of New York, 114 App. Div. 249, affirmed.
(Submitted January 25, 1907;
decided February 19, 1907.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Sujireme Court in the third judicial department, entered July 16, 1906, which affirmed a determination of the Court, of Claims awarding damages to the plaintiff for in juries to growing crops arising from the flooding of lands by water discharged from the Erie canal.
Julius M. Mayer, Attorney-General (Willis H. Tennant of counsel), for appellant.
James Wright for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.