Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People ex rel. William G. Lyons, Appellant, v. Nathan Strauss et al., Commissioners, etc., Respondents, 1894 — 143 N.Y. 645 · caselaw · US
General
The People ex rel. William G. Lyons, Appellant, v. Nathan Strauss et al., Commissioners, etc., Respondents
143 N.Y. 645·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People ex rel. William G. Lyons, Appellant, v. Nathan Strauss et al., Commissioners, etc., Respondents.
(Argued June 19, 1894;
decided June 22, 1894.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of New York, made April 3,1893, which affirmed the proceedings of the defendants, as commissioners of parks of the city of New York, removing the relator froto the police force of the department of parks and dismissing a writ of certiorari to review the same.
Samuel A. Noyes for appellant.
D. J. Deem for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.