Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Johnson et al. v. Stevenson, 1948 — 335 U.S. 801 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Johnson et al. v. Stevenson
335 U.S. 801·Supreme Court of the United States·1948
Mr. Justice Murphy took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
October 5, 1948.
No.-.
Johnson et al. v. Stevenson.
Alvin 3. Wirtz, James V. Allred, Thurman Arnold, Abe Fortas, Hugh Cox, Raymond Buck, Luther E. Jones, Jr. and Everett L. Looney for petitioners.
Henry H. Brooks and Dan Moody for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
On consideration of the supplemental motion for stay submitted by counsel for the petitioners, it is ordered by this Court that the motion to expand the order of Mr. Justice Black of September 29, 1948, be, and it is hereby, denied.
Mr. Justice Murphy took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.