Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William Alexander, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The State of New York, Appellant, 1892 — 133 N.Y. 621 · caselaw · US
General
William Alexander, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The State of New York, Appellant
133 N.Y. 621·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William Alexander, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The State of New York, Appellant.
(Argued April 19, 1892;
decided May 6, 1892.)
Appeal from award made-by the Board of Claims April 15, 1891, in favor of the claimant.
Simon Wl JRosendale, Attorney-General, for appellant.
Tracy G. Becker for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinon.
All concur, except Earl, Ch. J., not voting, and Maynard, J., not sitting.
Award affirmed.