Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Petition of Patrick W. Cullinan, as State Commissioner of Excise, Respondent, for the Revocation of Liquor Tax Certificate No. 10,239. Panagioti Nicolya et al., Appellants, 1906 — 185 N.Y. 546 · caselaw · US
Tax
In the Matter of the Petition of Patrick W. Cullinan, as State Commissioner of Excise, Respondent, for the Revocation of Liquor Tax Certificate No. 10,239. Panagioti Nicolya et al., Appellants
185 N.Y. 546·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Petition of Patrick W. Cullinan, as State Commissioner of Excise, Respondent, for the Revocation of Liquor Tax Certificate No. 10,239. Panagioti Nicolya et al., Appellants.
Matter of Cullinan (Nicolya), 104 App. Div. 305, affirmed.
(Argued April 18, 1906;
decided May 8, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 28, 1905, which affirmed an order of Special Term revoking and canceling a liquor tax certificate.
James A. Allen for appellants.
Herbert H Kellogg and Albert O. Briggs for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur:. Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Chase, JJ. Not sitting: Willard Bartlett, J