Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Barrett v. United States; Mulligan et al. v. United States; Biddy v. Mississippi, 1973 — 414 U.S. 1087 · caselaw · US
General
Barrett v. United States; Mulligan et al. v. United States; Biddy v. Mississippi
414 U.S. 1087·Supreme Court of the United States·1973
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 72-1545.
No. 72-1553.
No. 72-1592.
Barrett v. United States, Mulligan et al. v. United States, Biddy v. Mississippi,
[MAJORITY]
ante, p. 824;
ante, p. 825; and
ante, p. 866. Motions to dispense with printing petitions for rehearing granted. Motions for leave to file petitions for rehearing denied.