Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Appraisal, under the Act in Relation to Taxable Transfers of Property, of the Property of Mary A. Edson Deceased. Margaret B. Edson et al., Appellants; The Comptroller of the State of New York et al., Respondents, 1899 — 159 N.Y. 568 · caselaw · US
Tax
In the Matter of the Appraisal, under the Act in Relation to Taxable Transfers of Property, of the Property of Mary A. Edson Deceased. Margaret B. Edson et al., Appellants; The Comptroller of the State of New York et al., Respondents
159 N.Y. 568·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Appraisal, under the Act in Relation to Taxable Transfers of Property, of the Property of Mary A. Edson Deceased. Margaret B. Edson et al., Appellants; The Comptroller of the State of New York et al., Respondents.
Matter of Edson, 38 App. Div. 19, affirmed.
(Argued June 6, 1899;
decided June 23, 1899.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 4, 18&9, reversing an order of the Surrogate’s Court of the county of New York modifying a prior order assessing a transfer tax upon certain property passing by the will of Mary A. Edson, deceased.
Tread/well Cleveland and Thomas T. Shermcm for appellants.
JoMsh Holmes, Jr., Elliot Danforth and Edgar J. Levey for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.