Contracts · MBE-tested
CAMEL COMPANY v. CHICAGO RAILWAY EQUIPMENT CO.
61 F.2d 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CAMEL COMPANY v. CHICAGO RAILWAY EQUIPMENT CO.
No. 4809.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
July 15, 1932.
William E. Anderson, of Chicago, Ill., for appellee.
Before ALSCHULER and EVANS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Now this day comes counsel for appellee and presents a certificate of the derk of the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, relating to an appeal in the above-entitled cause, and also presents a motion that this cause be docketed and the appeal dismissed.
On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed that this cause be docketed in this court, and that this appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, with costs.