Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Gwathmey v. Town of East Hampton, 1974 — 418 U.S. 907 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Gwathmey v. Town of East Hampton
418 U.S. 907·Supreme Court of the United States·1974
Mr. Justice Douglas would affirm the judgment for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Younger v. Harris, 401 U. S. 37, 58 (1971).
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 70-102.
Gwathmey v. Town of East Hampton.
[See also No. 70-102, Cohn v. Long Island Vietnam Moratorium Committee, supra.]
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from C. A. 2d Cir. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Younger v. Harris, 401 U. S. 37 (1971), and Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U. S. 66 (1971).
Mr. Justice Douglas would affirm the judgment for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Younger v. Harris, 401 U. S. 37, 58 (1971).