Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Arrow Distilleries, Inc. v. Alexander, Administrator of the Federal Alcohol Administration, 1939 — 306 U.S. 615 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Arrow Distilleries, Inc. v. Alexander, Administrator of the Federal Alcohol Administration
306 U.S. 615·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 552.
Arrow Distilleries, Inc. v. Alexander, Administrator of the Federal Alcohol Administration.
January 30, 1939.
Mr. Horace J. Donnelly, Jr. for appellant.
Solicitor General Jackson for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
Motion of the appellee to affirm granted and order denying an interlocutory injunction affirmed. Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231; United Gas Co. v. Public Service Comm’n, 278 U. S. 322, 326; National Fire Insurance Co. v. Thompson, 281 U. S. 331, 338; Eureka Productions, Inc. v. Lehman, 302 U. S. 634.