Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Yuen et al. v. California, 1939 — 308 U.S. 555 · caselaw · US
General
Yuen et al. v. California
308 U.S. 555·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 340.
Yuen et al. v. California.
October 9, 1939.
Mr. George Olshausen for petitioners. • Mr. Earl Warren, Attorney General of California, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, 3d Appellate District, of California, and motiori-for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis, denied.