Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
COX v. WESTERN LAND AND CATTLE COMPANY, 1887 — 123 U.S. 375 · caselaw · US
General
COX v. WESTERN LAND AND CATTLE COMPANY
123 U.S. 37531 L. Ed. 178·Supreme Court of the United States·1887
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
COX v. WESTERN LAND AND CATTLE COMPANY.
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS.
Submitted November 16, 1887.
Decided November 21, 1887.
It appearing that the amount in controversy does not exceed five thousand dollars, the writ of error is dismissed.
This was a motion to dismiss. The case is stated in the opinion.
Mr. Alexander Me Coy for the motion.
Mr. R. A. Childs opposing.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Chief Justice Waite]
Mr. Chief Justice Waite
delivered the opinion of the court.
This motion is granted on the ground that the record shows that the value of the matter in dispute does not exceed five thousand dollars: The suit was brought originally to recover 135 head of Colorado steers, alleged to be worth $6000. At the time of the judgment only 79 head were in dispute. As to the rest, a settlement had been made during the pendency of the suit. The court has found as a fact that the 79 head were sold in open market the day after they were taken possession of under the writ in this case, and that the net proceeds of the sale only amounted to $4526.15. There is nothing to show that they were really any less valuable at the time of the sale than when they were taken. Upon the facts as found the recovery could not have exceeded five thousand dollars if there had been a judgment in favor of Cox, the plaintiff in error.
Dismissed.